Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Disney's Lady and the Tramp characters
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- List of Disney's Lady and the Tramp characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Almost all original interpretation and in-universe style. Little or no real-world connections, and those that are present are uncited. McDoobAU93 13:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (gas) @ 16:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (parlez) @ 16:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment: I'm not sure I can vote (can IPs vote?), but if I can I say keep but with improvements. This article has pretty much every character in the first film and most of the characters from the sequel, but it still lacks sources. Some of the OR parts wouldn't seem like OR if they had sources or were reworded to a more neutral tone. By now this article seems to have a lot of notability (just look at all the information available), but it still needs help. This article and the article about the first film have been the target of vandalism by a disruptive user for the past three months, but hopefully that user will be blocked. If you look in the history of this article you will see it started out pretty pathetic but got much better. At the very least can it at least just redirect to the original Lady and the Tramp article without being deleted? People might search for this, I mean other Disney movies have character articles, like The Little Mermaid, and Beauty and the Beast, and of course, The Lion King. 69.174.87.44 (talk) 21:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, a case of WP:UNDUE to treat characters from a 2001 direct-to-DVD "sequel" as if they are on common footing with the widely-seen (and regularly rereleased) 1955 theatrical film. Original characters should be described in the parent film article (which I see lacks such descriptions at present), with the DVD article merely noting which ones appear from the original film and describing new characters unique to the DVD. postdlf (talk) 22:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- There exists a description of the characters from the sequel at Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure#Cast, perhaps just remove the Junkyard Dogs section and merge it there? Most of the characters in this article are relevant to the original film (some of these characters didn't even appear in the second film and others had smaller roles). If this article cannot be kept the idea of a redirect is logical, as any noteworthy information not already present in the two articles about the two animated films can be merged. A similar debate is currently going on at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International broadcast of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic. 64.134.27.24 (talk) 00:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, article seems to restate only plot points throughout. Would be much better if redirected instead. NewJibaJabba (talk) 04:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.