Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 August 26
August 26
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's a logo... I doubt that it is licensed as indicated. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 00:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
cropping. Probably uploader is not the copyright holder. Photo should came from various website, e.g. http://www.elicriso.it/it/arte/toru_iwaya/immagini/toru_iwaya.jpg Trixt (talk) 11:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your concern, however please notice that:
Cropping doesn't enhance the resolution of the original picture.
Cropping doesn't show ares not previously visible in the original picture itself.
Full-size-higher-resolutions of this picture are not available anywhere on the 'Net, simply because they have never been uploaded anywhere.
I took the picture on January 2006 and the original, full size, unedited, picture is in my possession.
Where else did you see this picture?
Gdavoli (talk) 1:33am, September 1th 2009 (GMT)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, retagged as non-free. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Painter is still alive Trixt (talk) 11:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the revised copyright notice in the image itself Gdavoli (talk) September 1st 2009 2:47am Tuesday (GMT)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, retagged as non-free. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Painter is still alive Trixt (talk) 11:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the revised copyright notice in the image itself Gdavoli (talk) September 1st 2009 2:47am Tuesday (GMT)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Stated source of "my computer" doesn't give much hope that this is actually user-created. Looks like an old image which has been scanned from some other source. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another collage of images, some of which are non-free. Thus the image as a whole is non-free and requires a rationale for each use. As it is currently orphaned, it should be deleted regardless. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If even one image is non-free, it taints the whole thing, and no rationale I can think of would suffice to use this. Stifle (talk) 11:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.